Posts
Greetings,
Today I will discuss the custom cut recipient blade sizes in hair transplant procedures that I use to create the recipient sites for my hair transplant grafts. I have a machine which allows me to cut custom sized blades. Typically my blades range in size from .5mm-1.1mm and I have blade sizes in every size in between in .05mm increments. This allows me to use the smallest possible blade for the patients natural follicular units. The hair type and caliber are defining characteristics that determine which size blade to use. Typically I try to find the smallest possible blade which still allows for easy placement. An extra .1mm opening may not seem like much, but when multiplied by 1500-3000, which is the number of recipient sites I create in a typical hair transplant procedure, an extra .1mm can add up to significantly more injury to the scalp and circulation, which in most cases is not necessary. I also custom cut my blades with a 45 degree angle at the end and I angle the deepest portion of the blade so that it is at the superior aspect of the incision. This means that the blade also causes less injury to the scalp circulation and positions the graft at a more acute angle which gives a better final result. Minimizing damage to the scalp and the vascular bed minimizes scar tissue in the scalp and thus minimizes the potential of “shock loss” (which I will address in another blog entry).
I hope this blog entry clarifies why the blade size is very important in Hair Transplant Procedures.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Hair Transplant Procedures In Patients With Old Plugs
Greetings,
It is not unusual for me to see patients presenting for consultation who have plugs from the old way of performing hair transplant surgery. The plugs were groupings of 5-15 hairs that were punched out of the back of the scalp, and subsequently punched into the areas of thinning. They were very unnatural and looked like “dolls hair” because hair does not naturally grow in clusters of 5-15 hairs. Natural hair follicles are typically 1-4 hairs per follicle, with only single hair follicles present in the hairline. These plugs were harvested using a primitive version of the harvesting procedure we now call follicular unit extraction or FUE. The major difference is that the punch tool used to harvest the plugs measured between 2mm-5mm in diameter, while the new tools I use to harvest my FUE follicles measure between .8mm-1mm in diameter. Besides the unnatural look that these plugs left in the recipient zone, they also caused a huge amount of scarring in the donor zone. Often times these patients donor density can be decreased up to 50-75% from their original density. For these patients wearing their hair very short is not an option as their donor density has been so depleted that they must wear their hair longer in order to cover up the thinness. In most cases the best way to treat these patients is to perform a strip harvest procedure and go right through the old plug zone. If there are areas that are unscathed (sometimes the sides are untouched) the patient will have more yield from these regions. Regardless, depending on the amount of scarring and door depletion, we can often harvest between 1500-2000 grafts from these individuals by taking a maximum safe sized donor strip. In some cases, this procedure may be performed more than once. We can then transplant single hair follicles into the hairline, camouflaging the plugs, and transplant follicular units into the pluggy areas throughout, creating a much more natural look. In some cases we can also perform FUE to plugs in the hairline to remove them completely or to reduce the number of hairs in the plug, and then recycle the follicles further back on the scalp.
The technology in hair transplant procedures has come a long way since the days of the old plugs. The good news is that using the latest technology at our disposal we can improve the look of the old hair transplant plug procedures.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Greetings,
Today I want to demonstrate an interesting case I just treated. This patient had 3 previous procedures with other physicians in the past and presented requesting more density and dissatisfaction with his donor scars from his previous procedures. On examination what I saw was 3 different strip scars from the previous Hair Transplants in different areas, and in some areas a large scar from the coalescing of the multiple scars. In my patients, I always include the old donor scar in the new incision when a patient comes back for more grafts. It is only in very rare cases (an example would be someone who has a very wide donor scar from a previous procedure) that I will take a fresh swath from a new area. The reason for taking out the old scar is so that you don’t end up with train track scars throughout the donor region. Also, multiple smaller scars can coalesce to form larger scars which can then become difficult to conceal with shorter hair. This patient had very elastic scalp which allowed me to take out all the old scars and create one new fine scar. In addition, I was able to get a good amount of donor hair from the sides, which had not yet been harvested from. I will demonstrate this patient’s photos below (pre procedure and 12 days later) and I look forward to showing his photos in 6-9 months when the area is even more healed than it is now, but in these photos you can see an appreciable difference already.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Greetings,
Sometimes when I meet a patient for the first time in consultation, they come to me with their mind made up as to which harvest procedure for the hair transplant they wish to undergo. Other times they come to me with no idea as to which harvest method for the hair transplant that they prefer. The Internet has been an amazing tool to educate patients regarding all aspects of hair transplant procedures, however there is a huge amount of misinformation in the Internet as well. Often it is difficult for the average consumer to differentiate between the truth and the fiction. To further complicate things, some Hair Transplant surgeons have their own agendas as well. These physicians may only be proficient in either FUT or FUE, and may then try to steer patients towards the procedure that they are more comfortable with. In other instances, the physician may have purchased an expensive piece of equipment that he needs to pay for, and then will steer patients towards the procedure which helps to pay off the equipment.
When I meet with patients the first thing I do is pay close attention to the hairstyle they wear when they come into my office. How short their hair is, how it is combed, product in the hair, hair color, etc. These are all clues that help me to understand the patient as an individual. In addition, between the family history of hair loss and the patients physical exam, I do my best to estimate how severe the patient’s hair loss will progress over time. I explain in depth the pros and cons of FUT hair transplant versus FUE hair transplant and tell the patient that I have no vested interest in which procedure the patient decides to have. I truly enjoy performing both FUT and FUE. My only interest is that the patient undergoes the procedure that suits them best. Not just in the short term but in the long term as well. That is part of my duty to my patients. I encourage my patients to take their time in deciding which procedure suits them best, so that they make the right decision. Not a quick decision that could prove to be wrong in the long term.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Greetings,
Today I wold like to discuss the term Hair Transplant Or Hair Transfer. This term has become synonymous with the process of moving hair follicles from the donor zone on the scalp to areas of thinning or balding. The term Hair Transplant has always bothered me, as the term transplant is typically used to describe the donation of an organ from one individual to another. The hair taken from one individual will not grow if placed on another person unless both individuals are identical twins. Therefore, in actuality the term hair transplant is a misnomer as we are never taking hair from one person to transplant onto another. What we are actually performing is a hair transfer. We move hair follicles from the permanent donor zone on the back and sides (this is the hair that is immune to the process of genetic balding) to the areas of thinning. I would like to encourage others to begin to use the term hair transfer when discussing the process we perform as I believe it will help more people to understand what is involved in the process we routinely call hair transplant procedures.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Greetings,
Today I will discuss microscopic dissection in Hair Transplant procedures. Since the advent of Follicular Unit Hair Transplantation there are many different ways that physicians employ their staff to dissect the donor strip into individual follicular units in the process of hair transplant procedures, that is the groupings of hair that naturally occur on the scalp that we seek to move to the areas of thinning. There are many different types of microscopes that people use to dissect grafts and many different levels of magnification. Some physicians only have their staff use magnifying glasses on light boxes. I personally have my staff dissecting our grafts using brand new state of the art microscopes with 10x magnification and LED lighting. These microscopes are much more expensive than the typical microscopes but I believe they perform a superior job in dissecting the grafts. The 10x magnification is necessary to visualize the follicle in it’s entirety and allow for optimal dissection and the LED lighting provides excellent visualization while generating almost no heat (which typical lighting generates and can cause the grafts to dry out thus diminishing their chances of survival). Lessor magnification can result in the loss of intact follicles that cannot be visualized under lower magnification. This is turn can lead a lower survival of grafts in the hair transplant procedure.
In summary, state of the art high powered LED lit microscopes are more expensive, but superior in creating healthy follicular units for use in hair transplant procedures.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Greetings,
Today I would like to discuss the closure of the hair transplant donor strip in FUT, which is the strip harvest procedure. This is where we take a strip of hair from the donor zone and dissect it into individual follicular units for transplanting. In order to have an excellent result in the donor region (a fine linear donor scar, between 1-3mm in width) it is imperative to limit the width of the donor strip. Keeping the donor strip limited to a width of 10-15mm is usually safe for a fine scar result. Performing a trichophytic closure (which I have discussed in previous blog entries) can cause the hair to grow through the scar, further camouflaging it. Some physicians prefer to close the door region using staples. This technique is much quicker and easier for the physician. It is also much more uncomfortable for the patient. Sleeping on hard staples in the back of your scalp can be very painful. Staples are also painful to remove. I prefer to use a fine nylon suture which takes longer to place, but is much more comfortable to sleep on and is painless in it’s removal. I also believe that the healing with sutures is better than with staples. I typically have my patients leave their sutures in for 12-14 days before removing them. In hair transplantation there are always many different ways that each step of the process can be performed. It is imperative that the treating physician make decisions that are best for the patient in both the short term and long term.
All the best,
Marc Dauer, MD
Dr. Marc Dauer, MD is a board certified leader in hair restoration, hair transplants, eyebrow restoration for men and women, hair transplants for scars, and facial hair transplants. Dr Dauer is experienced with successfully treating and restoring hair loss of the scalp, eyebrows, sideburns, male pattern baldness, female pattern baldness and from scarring. Dr. Dauer is board certified by the American Board Of Hair Restoration Surgery and a member of the prestigious International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery. Dauer Hair Restoration provides hair restoration, FUE and FUT, hair transplants. Los Angeles hair loss treatments, eyebrow transplants, sideburn transplant, treatment for male pattern baldness and female pattern baldness, and transplantation for scarring. We serve patients from the Los Angeles area including, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, West Los Angeles, Culver City, Brentwood, Bel Air, Beverly Hills, Hollywood, Manhattan Beach, Redondo Beach, Malibu and beyond. Consider Dr. Dauer for your hair restoration needs.
Hair Transplant Santa Monica CA | Hair Transplant Beverly Hills, CA | Hair Transplant Doctor Beverly Hills, CA | FUE Hair Transplant in Beverly Hills, CA
Hair Loss Surgery Beverly Hills, CA | Hair Loss Doctor Santa Monica, CA | Hair Transplant Surgeon Beverly Hills, CA | Hair Restoration Surgeon Beverly Hills, CA
REACH US
Dauer Hair Restoration
2080 Century Park East
Suite 1802
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Phone: (310) 748-2224
md@mdnewhair.com
NEW! New York City Office
HAIR TRANSPLANT INFO
STAY UP TO DATE
HAIR TRANSPLANT AFFILIATIONS
• American Hair Loss Association
• International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery
• International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
• American Board of Hair Restoration Surgery